Northwestern Michigan College Home Page
| Site Map | Staff Intranet (login required; staff only)
Institutional Research > Links > IR Resources Revised 8/19/08

Resources

 

Accountability, Assessment, Accreditation


Spellings' Commission on the Future of Higher Education

Pre-publication Report of the Commission
A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education
Final report of the Secretary's Commission on the Future of Higher Education.
Reports presented to The Commission
News articles on the Commission's Report


IPEDS

Department of Education Proposed Increased Data Collection via IPEDS
"The U.S. Education Department is quietly moving ahead with plans to significantly expand the information and data it collects from colleges each year through an online survey — including an entirely new section that would require institutions to report on the accountability measures they use and their scores on those tests or tools." "The two most significant categories of new information that the department is requesting (which, if approved by OMB, would be voluntary in 2007-8 and required in 2008-9) would be what the department calls “a new accountability part” and an expanded section of information about financial aid, which seems to be designed to help the department come up with a method of reporting on the “net price” that different categories of students might really pay (as opposed to the “sticker price” that gets widely reported) to attend a particular college." 2/19/2007


Papers from other Associations, including AACC, and editorials


National Conference of State Legislatures

American Higher Education Must Be Reformed, State Legislators Say
National Conference of State Legislatures - Blue Ribbon Commission on Higher Education
Analysis of NCSL report


NASULGC

Elements of Accountability for Public Universities and Colleges
Toward a Public Universities and Colleges Voluntary System of Accountability for Undergraduate Education
This is the third discussion draft, the second was Elements of Accountability for Public Universities and Colleges. August 2006
Article on the NASULGC Accountability Paper

Addressing the Challenges: Facing American Undergraduate Education
sets forth a number of challenges before higher education and embraces change to deal with them
AACC Statement on the Final Report of the Secretary of Education’s
Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (2006)
The National Academies was asked by Senator Lamar Alexander and Senator Jeff Bingaman of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, with endorsement by Representative Sherwood Boehlert and Representative Bart Gordon of the House Committee on Science, to respond to the following questions: What are the top 10 actions, in priority order, that federal policymakers could take to enhance the science and technology enterprise so that the United States can successfully compete, prosper, and be secure in the global community of the 21st century? What strategy, with several concrete steps, could be used to implement each of those actions?
Editorial on access, by two former private college presidents
The Elephant in the Student Aid Office

Education Trust

Engines of Inequality - Diminishing Equity in the Nation's Premier Public Universities
Insider Higher Ed: Flagships Flunked on Access


Assessment of Learning

National Assessment of Adult Literacy - NAAL Home
What is NAAL? The 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy is a nationally representative assessment of English literacy among American adults age 16 and older. Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), NAAL is the nation’s most comprehensive measure of adult literacy since the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS). In 2003, over 19,000 adults participated in the national and state-level assessments, representing the entire population of U.S. adults who are age 16 and older, most in their homes and some in prisons from the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Approximately 1,200 inmates of federal and state prisons were assessed in order to provide separate estimates of literacy for the incarcerated population. By comparing results from 1992 and 2003, NAAL provides the first indicator in a decade of the nation’s progress in adult literacy. NAAL also provides information on adults’ literacy performance and related background characteristics to researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and the general public. NAAL Components NAAL includes a number of components that capture the breadth of adult literacy in the United States: * Background Questionnaire—helps identify the relationships between adult literacy and select demographic and background characteristics; * Prison Component—assesses the literacy skills of adults in federal and state prisons; * State Assessment of Adult Literacy (SAAL)—gives statewide estimates of literacy for states participating in the state-level assessment; * Health Literacy Component—introduces the first-ever national assessment of adults’ ability to use their literacy skills in understanding health-related materials and forms; * Fluency Addition to NAAL (FAN)—measures basic reading skills by assessing adults’ ability to decode, recognize words, and read with fluency; and * Adult Literacy Supplemental Assessment (ALSA)—provides information on the ability of the least-literate adults to identify letters and numbers and to comprehend simple prose and documents. http://nces.ed.gov/NAAL/index.asp?file=AboutNAAL/WhatIsNAAL.asp&PageId=2
State Assessment of Adult Literacy (SAAL)
The State Assessment of Adult Literacy (SAAL) is an assessment of adult literacy within a participating state. Conducted in conjunction with 2003 NAAL data collection, SAAL collects additional data within a participating state.
National Forum on College Level Learning
Welcome to the National Forum on College-Level Learning, the first attempt to measure what college students know and can do across states. In this Pew-sponsored pilot study, five states (Illinois, Kentucky, Nevada, Oklahoma, and South Carolina) have collected information on college-level learning from tests that students now take when they leave college, national assessments of adult literacy, surveys of students and alumni, and tests of general intellectual skills given to a representative sample of students. The results make it possible to assess both the intellectual capital available to these states and the contributions that their colleges and universities (two and four year, public and private) collectively make to it. The attached documents should give you a more complete understanding of the project.
ACT : WorkKeys
WorkKeys® assessments give students and workers reliable, relevant information about their workplace skill levels. Combined with information about skill levels required for jobs, assessments information can help users make better career and educational decisions.
MAPP OverviewMeasure of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP)
The Measure of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP) test is a measure of college-level reading, mathematics, writing, and critical thinking in the context of the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. The MAPP test is designed for colleges and universities to assess their general education outcomes, so they may improve the quality of instruction and learning. It focuses on the academic skills developed through general education courses, rather than on the knowledge acquired about the subjects taught in these courses.
Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP)
The Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP) is the standardized, nationally normed assessment program from ACT that enables postsecondary institutions to measure, evaluate, and enhance the outcomes of their general education programs.
NPEC Sourebook on Assessment: Definitions and Assessment Methods for Communication, Leadership, Information Literacy, Quantitative Reasoning, and Quantitative Skills
The NPEC Sourcebook on Assessment provides descriptive information about commercially developed instruments that are designed to assess communication skills, leadership skills, information literacy, quantitative reasoning, and quantitative skills for use in postsecondary education settings. The information provided for each instrument includes the content area it assesses, its cost, content, its reliability and validity, strengths, and limitations when this information was available. This sourcebook also examines definitions and important student outcomes in each of the 5 areas and cites resources that provide more in-depth information about the issues involved in measuring these 5 areas. Audiences who might find this publication helpful include faculty, assessment professionals, institutional researchers, and others who are involved in selecting assessments and developing assessment processes.
Collegiate Learning Assessment
The Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) is an innovative approach to assessing your institution’s contribution to student learning developed by CAE with the RAND Corporation. Our measures are designed to simulate complex, ambiguous situations that every successful college graduate may one day face. Life is not like a multiple choice test, with four or five simple choices for every problem. So we ask students to analyze complex material and provide written responses. The CLA measures are uniquely designed to test for reasoning and communications skills that most agree should be one outcome of a college education. Most CLA participants assess their institution cross-sectionally, testing a sample of first year students in the fall and a sample of seniors in the spring. You receive two reports, the first after fall testing that looks at how your entering class compares to other CLA participants (adjusted for SAT or ACT scores). Then after testing of seniors in the spring, you receive a full Institutional Report that evaluates your schools value-added on a comparative basis. Testing every year allows you to measure for effects of changes in curriculum or pedagogy. You also receive an annual CLA in Context report that looks at the results nationally and helps your institution consider ways to utilize the CLA results.
Measuring Up | Learning Assessments - Ewell

Advise for Media on Covering Learning Assessment

Report on Covering the Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education
this report will help journalists understand the history, context, and efforts to measure learning in America’s colleges and universities so that they may expand their coverage to take note of these activities.
2006_hechinger.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Article on the Variety of Assessments Already in Place


Other Assessments


Editorial Projects in Education - From Cradle to Career

From Cradle to Career: Connecting American Education From Birth to Adulthood - Executive Summary
From Cradle to Career: Executive Summary
Chance for Success Index Map
The new Chance-for-Success Index, developed for the report by the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, provides a state-focused perspective on the importance of education throughout a person’s lifetime. The index is based on 13 indicators that highlight whether young children get off to a good start, succeed in elementary and secondary school, and hit crucial educational and economic benchmarks as adults.
Indicators and sources for "From Cradle to Career"

Community College Survey of Student Engagement
The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) provides a much-needed tool for assessing quality in community college education. CCSSE results help colleges focus on good educational practice — defined as practice that promotes high levels of student learning and retention — and identify areas in which community colleges can improve their programs and services for students. All our work is grounded in research about what works in strengthening student learning and persistence.
Measuring Quality: Choosing Among Surveys and Other Assessments of College Quality
A co-publication of the Association for Institutional Research and American Council on Education, Measuring Quality: Choosing Among Surveys and Other Assessments of College Quality provides advice to college presidents and provosts on using national surveys as part of an institutional self-assessment plan. It was written by Victor Borden, Associate Vice Chancellor for Information Management and Institutional Research at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) and Jody L. Zak Owens, Research Assistant and Graduate Student in higher education and student affairs at Indiana University. The publication is intended to give institutional researchers, presidents and provosts a clearer understanding of a rapidly expanding set of outcomes measures in order to make more informed choices about the use of these tools. The guide also describes in detail 30 of the major national surveys and assessments. Although the guide does not rate or recommend these services, it suggests the criteria campus leaders should use to determine the use and usefulness of any survey instrument or service, based on specific campus needs, capabilities, and goals.
Measuring Up | The National Report Card on Higher Education
Analysis of Measuring Up 2006
NAICU | Colleges, Universities & Accountability


Learning Outcomes


Assessment of Learning

A Warning on Measuring Learning Outcomes
An essay by Trudy Banta on the problems with the use of learning assessment to measure value-added and to compare institutions.


College Learning of the New Global Century

A report of the Association of American Colleges and Universities outlining curricular goals for all colleges. 1/10/07

College Learning for the Global Century
A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education & America's Promise
Article from Insider HigherEd


Council for Higher Education Accreditation

Report on 2007 Annual Meeting
"Accrediting officials have heard the message ad nauseum: Policy makers and the public need more evidence that colleges are educating their students, and it's up to higher education - accreditors included - to produce that evidence....The reaction from the audience of college officials and accreditors suggested that at this point, outright opposition seems to have morphed into resignation, and even partial embrace. But it was equally clear that while they generally accept the idea that colleges must prove that they are educating their students, they have serious problems with the underlying premise that the only truly useful ways of measuring student learning outcomes are those that allow for comparing a college against its peers."


Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce

The New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce
The National Center on Education and the Economy created the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce to chart a course for the United States in a much more complicated global economy. The Commission released its recommendations to the public on December 14, 2006. The final report proposes a restructuring that America’s economic preeminence hinges on the preeminence of our educational system. Unfortunately, America has been lagging behind on key educational indicators for quite some time. Nothing short of radical change will turn the situation around. The final report will propose a restructuring of educational priorities that will have a major impact on all levels of education – from preschool to college and beyond. The 2006 report is titled Tough Choices or Tough Times.
Tough Choices or Tough Times
Executive summary
Inside Higher Ed: Seeking a New Skills Revolution
Starting in the 1980’s, a worldwide market of low-skill labor began draining jobs overseas, threatening the wages of Americans. In response, the Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce — a bipartisan group of business, government, and education leaders — laid out a plan in 1990 for the United States. The group suggested that the country focus its economy on high end products and services to keep wages from declining. On Thursday, [12/14/06] the commission released a new report, “Tough Choices or Tough Times,” which is calling for a complete revamping of the educational system to ensure that America can remain a global leader. Because these changes affect so many aspects of the educational system — college admissions, teachers’ unions, and the funding of local school districts — members of the commission acknowledge that they face an uphill battle.
Chronicle: Panel on Work-Force Skills Calls for Drastic Overhaul of America's Education System

Debate Grows as Colleges Slip in Graduations - New York Times


Accreditation

Overview of U.S. Accreditation - 2006
The Condition of Accreditation, U.S. Accreditation in 2005


Benchmarks and Metrics for Institutional Effectiveness


Stewardship

Jobs, News and Views for All of Higher Education - Inside Higher Ed :: A Sustainability Report Card
College Sustainability Report Card